Table 4.

Fit statistics of nested models in middle-aged (40–65 years) Danish twins.

q1−2LLAICvsdfχ2PRemarks
Model
 0Saturated12303.315327.315rmz = 0.28 (0.09;0.44)
rdz = 0.12 (−0.05;0.27)
 1ACE6317.049329.0491 vs 0613.730.03
 2AE5317.049327.0492 vs 11∼0.00∼1.00a2 = 0.27 (0.10;0.41)
e2 = 0.73 (0.59;0.90)
 3CE5318.705328.7053 vs 111.660.20
 4E4326.950334.9504 vs 219.90<0.002
 5ADE6316.989328.9895 vs 0613.670.03
 6DE5317.279327.2796 vs 510.290.59
Linkage + sex, age
 7AEQ6316.724328.7245 vs 710.330.57a2 = 0.04 (0.00;0.41)
e2 = 0.74 (0.59;0.90)
q2 = 0.23 (0.00;0.41)
Association + sex, age
 8AE + ab + aw + db + dw9296.879314.8795 vs 8420.17<0.001
 9AE + (ab = aw) + (db = dw)7297.705311.7059 vs 820.830.36a2 = 0.25 (0.08;0.40)
e2 = 0.75 (0.60;0.92)
 10AE + (ab = aw) + (db = dw = 0)6302.162314.16210 vs 914.460.03
Linkage in the presence of association + sex, age
 11AEQ + (ab = aw) + (db = dw)8297.137313.1379 vs 1110.570.54a2 = 0.00 (0.00;0.39)
e2 = 0.76 (0.61;0.91)
q2 = 0.24 (0.00;0.39)