Table 3.

Fit statistics of nested models in young (18–39 years) Danish twins.

q1−2LLAICvsdfχ2PRemarks
Model
 0Saturated12321.223345.223rmz = 0.64 (0.53;0.72)
rdz = 0.30 (0.16;0.42)
 1ACE6327.075339.0751 vs 065.850.44
 2AE5327.075337.0752 vs 11∼0.00∼1.00a2 = 0.63 (0.53;0.71)
e2 = 0.37 (0.29;0.47)
 3CE5344.487354.4873 vs 1117.41<0.001
 4E4413.432421.4324 vs 2186.36<0.001
 5ADE6327.016339.0165 vs 065.790.45
 6DE5331.110341.1106 vs 514.090.04
Linkage + sex, age
 7AEQ6322.983334.9835 vs 714.090.04a2 = 0.15 (0.00;0.63)
e2 = 0.35 (0.27;0.44)
q2 = 0.50 (0.02;0.72)
Association + sex, age
 8AE + ab + aw + db + dw9263.057281.0575 vs 8464.02<0.001
 9AE + (ab = aw) + (db = dw)7267.513281.5139 vs 824.460.11a2 = 0.57 (0.45;0.66)
e2 = 0.43 (0.33;0.55)
 10AE + (ab = aw) + (db = dw = 0)6279.980291.98010 vs 9112.47<0.001
Linkage in the presence of association + sex, age
 11AEQ + (ab = aw) + (db = dw)8262.516278.5169 vs 1115.000.03a2 = 0.06 (0.00;0.51)
e2 = 0.41 (0.32;0.52)
q2 = 0.53 (0.07;0.67)