Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • Clinical Chemistry
    • Editorial Board
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Alerts
    • CE Credits
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Early Release
    • Future Table of Contents
    • Archive
    • Browse by Subject
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Permissions & Reprints
  • Resources
    • AACC Learning Lab
    • Clinical Chemistry Trainee Council
    • Clinical Case Studies
    • Clinical Chemistry Guide to Scientific Writing
    • Clinical Chemistry Guide to Manuscript Review
    • Journal Club
    • Podcasts
    • Q&A
    • Translated Content
  • Abstracts
  • Submit
  • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Chemistry
  • Other Publications
    • The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Clinical Chemistry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • About
    • Clinical Chemistry
    • Editorial Board
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Alerts
    • CE Credits
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Early Release
    • Future Table of Contents
    • Archive
    • Browse by Subject
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Permissions & Reprints
  • Resources
    • AACC Learning Lab
    • Clinical Chemistry Trainee Council
    • Clinical Case Studies
    • Clinical Chemistry Guide to Scientific Writing
    • Clinical Chemistry Guide to Manuscript Review
    • Journal Club
    • Podcasts
    • Q&A
    • Translated Content
  • Abstracts
  • Submit
  • Contact
Research ArticleArticle

Stronger Together: Aggregated Z-values of Traditional Quality Control Measurements and Patient Medians Improve Detection of Biases

Andreas Bietenbeck, Markus A. Thaler, Peter B. Luppa, Frank Klawonn
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.269845 Published July 2017
Andreas Bietenbeck
Institut für Klinische Chemie und Pathobiochemie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: andreas.bietenbeck@tum.de
Markus A. Thaler
Institut für Klinische Chemie und Pathobiochemie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter B. Luppa
Institut für Klinische Chemie und Pathobiochemie, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, München, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank Klawonn
Department of Biostatistics, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany; Department of Computer Science, Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences, Wolfenbüttel, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Fig. 1. The Westgard-like algorithm and the aggregation of Z-values under simplified conditions.

    Z(x) indicates Z-transformation. An out-of-control (OOC) condition may affect Z-values of both QCs equally (A) or unequally (B). The OOC condition shifts both QCs by 2 Z-values on average (C). ΔZ is the difference between the Z-transformed shifts of both QCs. Performance of control rules on simulated stable and OOC conditions with increasing ΔZ (D).

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Fig. 2. Steps of simulation.

    In each phase, true and measured values were generated (A). If 5% of measurements exceeded the allowable total error (TEa), the day was marked as out-of-control (OOC). Parameters for Z-values were calculated in a stable phase (B). Decision thresholds were determined and tested in independent error-prone phases. For 5 analytes, 200 runs were conducted (C).

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Fig. 3. Example of biases in 1 simulation of albumin.

    The top lane shows constant biases with constantly increasing and random parts. The middle lane depicts relative biases again with constantly increasing and random parts. The interaction of various biases creates a broad range of realistic out-of-control situations (bottom lane).

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Fig. 4. AUC values of quality control rules and simple quality control parameters.

    zWAggr, zAggr – weighted and unweighted aggregation of Z-values; west – Westgard-like algorithm; zWAggr.QC, zAggr.QC – weighted and unweighted aggregation of Z-values from control measurements only; west.QC – Westgard-like algorithm from internal QC measurements only; median - patient medians; QC_1, …, QC_4 - internal QC measurements.

  • Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Fig. 5. AUC values of quality rules and simple quality control parameters from disturbed simulations.

    zWAggr, zAggr – weighted and unweighted aggregation of Z-values; west – Westgard-like algorithm; zWAggr.QC, zAggr.QC – weighted and unweighted aggregation of Z-values from control measurements only; west.QC – Westgard-like algorithm from control measurements only; median - patient medians (median); QC_1, …, QC_4 - QC measurements. Outliers are removed for better clarity. “x” marks mAUC values from the undisturbed simulation.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Settings for simulation of five analytes.a

    AlbuminHbA1cTestosteroneTroponin IVitamin D3
    DescriptionMany measurements per day; normal distribution of true valuesLow sigma value; four QC measurementsBimodal distribution of true values based on sexMany measurements close to limit of detectionSeasonal variation of true values
    Measurements per day (SD)500 (50)70 (6)Male: 50 (5) Female: 30 (4)120 (20)200 (20)
    Distribution of valuesNormal; centerb: 3.474 spread: 0.886 (unit: g/dl)Lognormal; center: 5.504 spread: 0.892 (unit: %)Male: lognormal; center: 3.505 spread: 2.402 female: lognormal; center: 0.366 spread: 0.532 (unit: ng/mL)Lognormal; center: 0.160 spread: 0.656 (unit: ng/mL)Lognormal; center: 19.585 ± 7.5% seasonal variation; spread: 11.382 (unit: ng/mL)
    Allowable total error [on interval]12.5% [2–7]10% [4.89– 14.96]20.5% [0.2– 20]20% [0.1–35]25% [5–50]
    Precision
        αc0.0670.10.0080.0030.5
        ßd0.0310.0290.0340.0330.05
    Quality controls
        QC_13530.0510
        QC_26680.9530
        QC_38
        QC_410
    • ↵a α and ß are parameters of the characteristic function.

    • ↵b Center and spread denote mean and standard deviation for normal distribution.

    • ↵c α expresses constant imprecision at low concentration.

    • ↵d ß expresses relative imprecision similar to the coefficient of variation. For lognormal distribution, respective values are also provided on a non-logarithmized scale for better comparability.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplemental Data

    • Supplemental Tables and Figures
    • Supplemental Methods and Results
    • Supplemental Code
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Clinical Chemistry: 63 (8)
Vol. 63, Issue 8
August 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
  • Audio summary of this issue
Print
Share
Stronger Together: Aggregated Z-values of Traditional Quality Control Measurements and Patient Medians Improve Detection of Biases
Andreas Bietenbeck, Markus A. Thaler, Peter B. Luppa, Frank Klawonn
Clinical Chemistry Aug 2017, 63 (8) 1377-1387; DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.269845
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Stronger Together: Aggregated Z-values of Traditional Quality Control Measurements and Patient Medians Improve Detection of Biases
Andreas Bietenbeck, Markus A. Thaler, Peter B. Luppa, Frank Klawonn
Clinical Chemistry Aug 2017, 63 (8) 1377-1387; DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.269845

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • High-Throughput Mass Spectrometry Assay for Quantifying β-Amyloid 40 and 42 in Cerebrospinal Fluid
  • Diagnostic Evaluation of a High-Sensitivity Troponin I Point-of-Care Assay
  • Discovering Cross-Reactivity in Urine Drug Screening Immunoassays through Large-Scale Analysis of Electronic Health Records
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • SUBJECT AREAS
    • Laboratory Management

Options

  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Information for Authors
  • Resources
  • Abstracts
  • Submit
  • Contact
  • RSS

Other Publications

  • The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Footer logo

© 2019 American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Powered by HighWire