Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • Clinical Chemistry
    • Editorial Board
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Alerts
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Early Release
    • Future Table of Contents
    • Archive
    • Browse by Subject
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Permissions & Reprints
  • Resources
    • AACC Learning Lab
    • Clinical Chemistry Trainee Council
    • Clinical Case Studies
    • Clinical Chemistry Guide to Scientific Writing
    • Clinical Chemistry Guide to Manuscript Review
    • Journal Club
    • Podcasts
    • Q&A
    • Translated Content
  • Abstracts
  • Submit
  • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Chemistry
  • Other Publications
    • The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
Clinical Chemistry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • About
    • Clinical Chemistry
    • Editorial Board
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Alerts
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Early Release
    • Future Table of Contents
    • Archive
    • Browse by Subject
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Permissions & Reprints
  • Resources
    • AACC Learning Lab
    • Clinical Chemistry Trainee Council
    • Clinical Case Studies
    • Clinical Chemistry Guide to Scientific Writing
    • Clinical Chemistry Guide to Manuscript Review
    • Journal Club
    • Podcasts
    • Q&A
    • Translated Content
  • Abstracts
  • Submit
  • Contact
EditorialEditorial

Remnant Lipoproteins: Measurement and Clinical Significance

Ishwarlal Jialal, Sridevi Devaraj
Published February 2002
Ishwarlal Jialal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sridevi Devaraj
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In this issue of the Journal, Chan et al. (1) make the significant observation, by three distinct measures, that the concentrations of remnant lipoproteins (RLPs) in plasma are increased in patients with obesity. This increase in RLPs could explain, in part, the increased cardiovascular risk associated with obesity (2). To date, although LDL- and HDL-cholesterol are clearly accepted as independent risk factors for premature atherosclerosis, the role of plasma triglycerides as a risk factor remains somewhat controversial.

Plasma triglycerides are clearly a measure of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs), which derive from both the intestine and the liver. Measurement of plasma triglycerides, however, does not distinguish the various subspecies of TRLs, which clearly have various degrees of atherogenicity. Triglyceride-rich RLPs are formed in the circulation when chylomicrons of intestinal origin [with apolipoprotein B-48 (apo B-48)] and VLDL of hepatic origin (with apo B-100) are converted by lipoprotein lipase (and to a lesser extent by hepatic lipase) into smaller and more dense particles. Compared with their nascent precursors, RLPs are depleted of triglycerides, phospholipids, and apo C and are enriched in cholesteryl esters and apo E and are believed to be more atherogenic than the larger TRLs (3).

Several lines of evidence have implicated RLPs in premature atherosclerosis. In fact, the prototypic disorder of remnant metabolism, type III dyslipidemia, is associated with accelerated atherosclerosis (4). Other evidence incriminating remnants as proatherogenic factors include the following: increased intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) concentrations have been associated with an increased incidence or recurrence of coronary artery disease (CAD) (3). Increased IDL is also found in diseases associated with accelerated atherosclerosis, such as type III dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, end stage renal disease (ESRD), and familial combined hyperlipidemia. Several previous reports have linked various measures of remnants to CAD in controlled angiographic follow-up trials (5).

Further emphasis on RLPs was highlighted by the National Cholesterol Education Panel report, which recommended calculation of non-HDL cholesterol as a measure of RLPs (6). Although non-HDL cholesterol would clearly provide a measure of RLPs, it also is a measure of triglyceride-rich particles, which are not atherogenic. Nonetheless, it is clearly the first step in emphasizing the relevance of RLPs in evaluating cardiovascular risk.

Because of the heterogeneity of TRLs, measurement of RLPs has been difficult (3). RLPs can be identified, separated, and quantified according to differences in density, charge, size, specific lipid components, apolipoprotein composition, and/or apolipoprotein immunospecificity. Accurate quantification of plasma remnants is complicated because they are difficult to differentiate from their triglyceride-rich precursors, their rapid catabolism produces low concentrations in plasma, and at any given time, they are heterogeneous in size, density, and composition because they are present at various stages of catabolism.

The traditional method to separate RLPs is ultracentrifugation and measurement of cholesterol in the IDL fraction (3)(5). Numerous cross-sectional studies have shown that patients with CAD or diabetes or who have experienced myocardial infractions have increased plasma IDL-cholesterol compared with controls (3). Plasma IDL concentrations have been related to the extent and severity of angiographically assessed coronary atherosclerosis in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies (3)(5). Measurement of IDL-cholesterol by ultracentrifugation is not available in most clinical laboratories. Furthermore, the precision of the assay is far from optimal, and between-laboratory variability can be high.

RLPs can also be separated according to charge by agarose gel electrophoresis (double pre-β lipoproteins) or capillary isotachophoresis, or according to their size as midband lipoproteins (between VLDL and LDL bands) by 3% polyacrylamide or gradient gel electrophoresis. In addition, the concentrations of retinyl esters after ingestion of a fat-rich meal containing vitamin A have been used as markers of the presence of apo B-48-containing RLPs of intestinal origin. RLPs can also be quantified on the basis of their apolipoprotein composition. These include measurement of the amount of apo B associated with plasma lipoproteins containing apo E (LpE:B) or quantification of apo E in apo B-containing lipoproteins (LpB:E), as well as measurement of apo C III or apo B-48. Although these measures appear to be reliable indices of RLPs and correlate with atherosclerosis, they suffer from certain deficiencies, as detailed in a recent review by Cohn et al. (3).

Recently, an immunoaffinity chromatography method was introduced for assaying RLP concentrations according to their apolipoprotein content and immunospecificity (7). This methodology provides a quantitative measure of remnant status and can easily be adapted to the clinical laboratory. In this assay, RLPs are separated from plasma by immunoaffinity chromatography with a gel containing an anti-apo A1 and a specific apo B-100 monoclonal antibody (JI-H antibody, which does not recognize apo B-48 lipoproteins). The former antibody recognizes all HDL and any newly synthesized chylomicrons containing apo A1, whereas the latter antibody recognizes all apo B-100-containing lipoproteins except for certain particles enriched in apo E. HDL, LDL, large chylomicrons, and most VLDL are thus retained by the gel. The unbound RLPs are made up of remnant-like VLDL containing apo B-100 and TRLs containing apo B-48. This assay was initially approved by the Food and Drug Administration for diagnosis of type III dyslipidemia, where a molar ratio of RLP-cholesterol (RLP-C) to total triglyceride >0.23 (>0.10 when results are expressed in mg/dL) confirms a diagnosis (8); recently, it has also received approval for assessing CAD risk. The intra- and interassay CVs of this assay are <6% and 10%, respectively (9)(10). With this assay, plasma concentrations of RLP-C have been shown to be higher in patients with CAD, diabetes, or ESRD; in patients with coronary artery restenosis postangioplasty; and in cases of sudden cardiac death (3).

More importantly, RLP-C is increased at least threefold in patients with type III dyslipidemia (9). Increased RLP-C is a significant predictor of myocardial infarction in patients with vasospastic angina and has recently been shown to be strongly associated with angiographically verified progression of focal coronary atherosclerosis (11). The atherogenicity of RLPs is supported by the observations that RLPs can promote lipid accumulation by mouse peritoneal macrophages, stimulate whole-blood platelet aggregation, and impair endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation. RLPs promote endothelial dysfunction, a key early event in atherogenesis, up-regulating endothelial production of intercellular adhesion molecule, vascular cell adhesion molecule, and tissue factor. Kugiyama et al. (12) have shown that high RLP concentrations predict coronary events in CAD patients independently of traditional risk factors. Recently, Karpe et al. (13) showed a significant correlation of RLP-C to carotid intimal medial thickness in a cohort of healthy 50-year-old men; this association was independent of plasma triglycerides and LDL-cholesterol. Masuoka et al. (14) showed that RLP-C concentrations were strongly associated with coronary artery stenosis in normotriglyceridemic patients. Thus, this assay is a valid measure of RLPs that are proatherogenic and, in three prospective studies (12)(13)(14), has correlated with atherosclerosis or cardiovascular events.

In their report in this issue, Chan et al. (1) used four measures of remnant metabolism: RLP-C, apo B-48, apo C-III, and the fractional catabolic rate of a remnant emulsion. Although all four measures were abnormal in the obese patients, when the results were stratified for triglyceride concentrations, the best measure was RLP-C, which was increased in the patients with both high and normal triglycerides (<1.7 mmol/L). The authors documented significant correlations between RLP-C and both apo B-48 and apo C-III. Triglycerides accounted for <65% of the variance in these three markers. The correlation between RLP-C and apo B-48 suggests that chylomicron remnants account for only 36% of RLP-C. This study further underscores the validity of RLP-C as a measure of remnant metabolism.

RLP-C can be modulated by lipid-lowering therapy. Karpe et al. (11) examined the effect of gemfibrozil therapy on median RLP-C in the 2-year randomized, placebo-controlled Lipid and Coronary Angiography Trial (LOCAT). Gemfibrozil treatment reduced median RLP-C concentrations by 34% and was associated with a decrease in vein-graft stenosis. We have recently shown in a randomized crossover trial that simvastatin and atorvastatin effectively reduced RLP-C in patients with combined hyperlipidemia (15). Our results also suggest a strong correlation between reductions in plasma triglycerides and reductions in RLP-C. However, the reduction in triglycerides accounted for only ∼44% of the reduction in RLP-C.

Thus, each of these measures of remnant status identifies a different class of TRLs, but each of these TRLs represents a component of the overall remnant risk and has been shown, in many studies, not only to be atherogenic but also to predict atherosclerotic risk. Furthermore, this risk may be modulated by established therapies such as statin, fibrates, and possibly niacin therapy. In conclusion, the RLP-C assay is precise, is easily adaptable to the clinical laboratory, and is a valid measure of atherogenic TRL remnants, especially in patients with metabolic abnormalities such as obesity, the metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and ESRD.

The holy grail is to find a precise, accurate, cost-effective, standardized assay for RLPs that can easily be incorporated in the clinical laboratory. Currently, although the RLP-C assay fulfills most of these criteria, it is desirable that its standardization be optimized and that more studies be conducted to show that it predicts cardiovascular events independently. In addition, clinical findings by one technique may not be extrapolated to all other techniques.

  • © 2002 The American Association for Clinical Chemistry

References

  1. ↵
    Chan DC, Watts GF, Barrett PH, Mamo JCL, Redgrave TG. Markers of triglyceride-rich lipoprotein remnant metabolism in visceral obesity. Clin Chem 2001;48:278-283.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Nielsen S, Jensen MD. Obesity and cardiovascular disease—is body structure a factor. Curr Opin Lipidol 1997;8:200-204.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed Order article via Infotrieve
  3. ↵
    Cohn JS, Marcoux C, Davignon J. Detection, quantification, and characterization of potentially atherogenic triglyceride-rich remnant lipoproteins. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1999;19:2474-2486.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Mahley RW, Huang Y, Rall SC, Jr. Pathogenesis of type III hyperlipoproteinemia (dysbetalipoproteinemia): questions, quandaries, and paradoxes. J Lipid Res 1999;40:1933-1949.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Hodis HN. Triglyceride-rich lipoprotein remnant particles and risk of atherosclerosis. Circulation 1999;99:2852-2854.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    . . Executive summary of the third report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001;285:2486-2497.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed Order article via Infotrieve
  7. ↵
    Nakajima K, Saito T, Tamura A, Suzuki M, Nakano T, Adachi M, et al. Cholesterol in remnant-like lipoproteins in human serum using monoclonal anti apo B-100 and anti apo A-I immunoaffinity mixed gels. Clin Chim Acta 1993;223:53-71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed Order article via Infotrieve
  8. ↵
    Wang T, Nakajima K, Leary ET, Warnick GR, Cohn JS, Hopkins PN, et al. Ratio of remnant-like particle-cholesterol to serum total triglycerides is an effective alternative to ultracentrifugal and electrophoretic methods in the diagnosis of familial type III hyperlipoproteinemia. Clin Chem 1999;45:1981-1987.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Devaraj S, Vega G, Lange R, Grundy SM, Jialal I. Remnant-like particle cholesterol levels in patients with dysbetalipoproteinemia or coronary artery disease. Am J Med 1998;104:445-450.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed Order article via Infotrieve
  10. ↵
    Leary ET, Wang T, Baker DJ, Cilla DD, Zhoung J, Warnick GR, et al. Evaluation of an immunoseparation method for quantitative measurement of remnant-like particle-cholesterol in serum and plasma. Clin Chem 1998;44:2490-2498.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Karpe F, Taskinen MR, Nieminen MS, Frick MH, Kesaniemi YA, Pasternack A, et al. Remnant-like lipoprotein particle cholesterol concentration and progression of coronary and vein-graft atherosclerosis in response to gemfibrozil treatment. Atherosclerosis 2001;157:181-187.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed Order article via Infotrieve
  12. ↵
    Kugiyama K, Doi H, Takazoe K, Kawano H, Soejima H, Mizuno Y, et al. Remnant lipoprotein levels in fasting serum predict coronary events in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 1999;99:2858-2860.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Karpe F, Boquist S, Tang R, Bond GM, de Faire U, Hamsten A. Remnant lipoproteins are related to intima-media thickness of the carotid artery independently of LDL cholesterol and plasma triglycerides. J Lipid Res 2001;42:17-21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Masuoka H, Kamei S, Ozaki M, Kawasaki A, Shintani U, Ito M, et al. Predictive value of remnant-like particle cholesterol as an indicator of coronary artery stenosis in patients with normal serum triglyceride levels. Intern Med 2000;39:540-546.
    OpenUrlPubMed Order article via Infotrieve
  15. ↵
    Stein D, Devaraj S, Balis D, Huet BA, Jialal I. Effect of statin therapy on remnant lipoprotein cholesterol levels in patients with combined hyperlipidemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2001;21:2026-2031.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Clinical Chemistry: 48 (2)
Vol. 48, Issue 2
February 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Share
Remnant Lipoproteins: Measurement and Clinical Significance
Ishwarlal Jialal, Sridevi Devaraj
Clinical Chemistry Feb 2002, 48 (2) 217-219;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Citation Tools
Remnant Lipoproteins: Measurement and Clinical Significance
Ishwarlal Jialal, Sridevi Devaraj
Clinical Chemistry Feb 2002, 48 (2) 217-219;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Clinical Chemistry Views and Policy on Preprints
  • Fingerprint Drug Analysis: Overcoming Pitfalls and Heading Toward the Future?
  • How Clinical Laboratories May Improve Their Performance: The “High-Sensitivity” Troponin Paradigm
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • SUBJECT AREAS
    • Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Options

  • Home
  • About
  • Articles
  • Information for Authors
  • Resources
  • Abstracts
  • Submit
  • Contact
  • RSS

Other Publications

  • The Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Footer logo

© 2018 American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Powered by HighWire